Archive for the ‘Product Item Masterfile’ Category

Mobile Shopper Aids Invade! Are We Ready?

Saturday, August 25th, 2012

IBM and Amazon Flow announced new “augmented reality” consumer shopping aids last week.   The new devices add the ability to identify products on shelf using image recognition, to the already available bar code and QR code scanners.  Once a product is identified by image recognition the application can: 

  • ·         tell stories about the products                          
  • ·         play trailers of movies,
  • ·         playing cuts from a CD,
  •                  ibmaugmentedreality.jpg      
  •             compare prices with other stores
  • ·         display nutritional values, allergen warnings or more suitable alternatives or
  • ·         rank product features based on a shopper chosen criteria. 

Both applications are in for a hard row to hoe in CPG because of the Gap between the product images and data available from brands or commercial data capture houses, and the actual packaging on the retail shelf.   

ShelfSnap has done the only empirical studies of this gap (The Consumer Relevant Product Image and Data Gap) and found the gap between data and shelf to affect 64% the products commonly stocked on key retailer shelves.   To amplify the work it has already done on entire categories, ShelfSnap recently evaluated the gap for shopping baskets of almost two hundred items ordered online from one of the top two online grocers in the world.  

consumer-relevant-product-gap.jpg

 We compared what we saw online and the nutritional panel information for the products we ordered each week, to the products we received:

·         63% of the products delivered had packaging that differed from the image online.

·         58% of the items with differing packaging also had differences in the primary nutritional panel on the package vs. what was represented online.

·         The images used by the retailer were supplied by the manufacturer or by one of two top commercial houses claiming absolutely accurate data.  It may have been accurate for the products it portrayed, but it wasn’t Relevant to the products delivered or available on shelf to the consumer.

Without tying products the products that consumers are finding on shelf or in their delivery totes back to the product images and especially the health and wellness data in the mobile or online application brands and retailers will at least sub-optimize the potential of these great new tools, and more seriously may raise the consumer’s ire by appearing to mislead them.  Can anyone say Pink Slime?


 

 

 

How SHALL I Compete In Grocery MultiChannel?

Wednesday, May 16th, 2012

Most grocers are in their 2nd or starting their third generation online/mobile/social offering for their consumers.   Most are also being admonished, repeatedly at this year’s FMI, to be move more aggressively into the multichannel world.  Most grocers reportedly reacted with some hesitation as they try to sort out what things are bleeding edge and therefore unnecessary and what might get them “ahead” of their competition.  Unfortunately there is a great deal of advice, most of it expensive and much of it touting yesterday’s news.       

Bill Bishop did the first useful benchmarking of how consumers view their grocer’s digital offerings in his report Connecting with Modern Grocery Shoppers   (http://www.brickmeetsclick.com/special-offer–connecting-with-modern-grocery-shoppers ).  A fascinating read well worth the investment to get inside the issues, but the nub of it is that the consumer sees a pretty big gap between their view of their physical store and their view of the online offerings from that store.  In other words there is a lot of room for improvement and no one has this even close to right today!

 

(more…)

So-Lo-Mo and Just Plain O! Grocery Marketing Activity Offers Sea Change Opportunity!

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Social, Location, Mobile and just plain Online access to customers, gives Grocer’s and grocery-brands  a better, more effective and soon to be mandatory manner of communicating.  That communication can seal the loyalty deal, or it can push the shopper into a more fragmented multi-retailer, omni-channel , multi-product world.

 

Today there are many “grocery shopping assist” applications available to the consumer.  List builders, price comparers, deal offer-ers, product locators, healthy substituters, product alternative suggesters and others.

·         In some cases these applications are offered by the retailer (Amazon’s price comparison tool,  Safeway’s feature price match program, Ahold’s Scanit).

·         In other cases the application is retailer agnostic and “customer-centric” (Google, Grocery Saver).

 

Regardless of the application approach used by each consumer, your store and your brand offerings are going to be compared against other choices.  You cannot help but to compete on price.  No grocery shopper wants to have paid more for their milk than their neighbor.

 

However, now is the time when you can chose to make price just part of the value equation which you offer customers rounding it out by including performance.   Bill Bishop refers to this opportunity in a recent blog of his at http://www.brickmeetsclick.com/updating-the-shopper-value-equation/

 

Let me broach two ways to bring performance into the equation allowing you to compete effectively against all current players regardless of their bricks, clicks or omni offering.  These two efforts tie out your communication efforts to your merchandising plans and to the actual condition of the shelf in a performance package that will satisfy your shoppers and that will be unmatched by your competition.

 

1.        Today you put a great deal of intellectual energy and creativity, collaboratively with your trading partner, in order to give your consumers the best possible shelf impression.  That planning, testing and re-planning is followed by tremendous efforts to put the plan into action.   How much time and energy is put into making sure that plan is still in place?

 

ShelfSnap has studied hundreds of products and categories in thousands of stores.   The assortment of products actually on-shelf for the very top brands in the very largest retailers differ from plan by an average of over 20%.   The facings presence on-shelf differed from plan by more than 50%.    The purpose of all that communication mentioned earlier is to drive shoppers to shelf to complete the deal.  When they get to the shelf and do not see products as you had planned them, the deal you were expecting to seal is ripped apart…the customer frustrated and you are just one more brand or store that promises great performance, but doesn’t deliver  on the promise. If you measure and make sure that the very well thought out plan is still on the shelf you will PERFORM 30-70% better than your competitors. 

 

2.       You are investing enormous effort understanding and experimenting with various So-Lo-Mo and O communications techniques and vehicles.  In order to “close the deal” in an online communication the shopper has to connect the product selected from the digital shelf with the one they encounter either on the real shelf or in the delivery tote.  If the product they see on shelf looks different from the product image they chose, or if their product doesn’t show up digitally  they will at least be confused, and in some cases frustrated. According to GS1UK at least half of these shoppers will either refuse to buy or will return the product if delivered.   All early indications from research is that consumers blame the retailer for the product “switch”.   At the very least “decision confusion” increases dwell time which translates into a smaller basket for that retailer.

 

ShelfSnap has matched virtually every source of grocery product images used by manufacturers, retailers and application providers  to products that actually sit on shelves in Walmart, Kroger and other critical retailers.  20% of the products on shelf have no images, or data to support any digital communication efforts, including shelf level health and wellness programs.  Of the products that are on the shelf and that do have images, in 46% of the cases the image is different from the package on the shelf.  When the image is different so too is the nutritional data over 60% of the time.

 

The short message here is take an active role in measuring and managing the matchup between product images in your communications efforts and the product packaging on the shelf.  ShelfSnap makes that matchup relatively painless, and the effort you go to in order to shore up the weakest link in the digital path to purchase will allow your offering to perform more than 50% more effectively than your competitor. 

 

digital2shelfmismatch.jpg

Usage Decay Rate on Mobile Applications Over 90%, Missing or Irrelevant Product Data The Cause?

Thursday, August 4th, 2011

One of the mobile application measurement services recently reported that the use of mobile applications generally fell off by over 90% after the initial post-download burst of enthusiasm.

In some ways this dramatic dropoff should not surprise as many low cost, reusable products and services (I-Pod songs, Happy Meal Toys) get scant attention after initial use.

Still, this 90+% decay curve is a staggering statistic and one that should give marketers pause.  Clearly in order to earn ongoing consumer usage an application must be:

  • Useful, having some utility meaningful for that consumer
  • Easily accessed
  • Easy to run (simply input in CPG that means either  a list of options salient to the user or the ability to scan a picture or bar-code for self selection)
  • Rewarding.  The application needs to have a high probability of returning data relevant to the person operating the application.

With regard to this last point,  a study run by GS1 UK examined consumer usage of mobile applications  involving consumers attempting to gain product information by scanning or taking pictures of products on the shelf.  The consumers were hoping for information  regarding:

  • health and wellness guidance
  • promotional offers
  • other product information

Over 90% of the usage attempts resulted in either no data or in images/data inconsistent with the actual brand data according to the manufacturer.

I am of the opinion that the only appropriate gauge of product image and data accuracy is one that begins with how relevant the product image and data are to the consumer when they visit the shelf.   If the product displayed in the application is not the product found on shelf then the data fails.  We call such data Consumer Relevant Product Data.  The gap between the data available for mobile and online applications and the package the consumer sees on the shelf, is called the Consumer Relevant Product Data Gap.  

ShelfSnap with two partners, are engaged in a much more in depth and ongoing review of this Consumer Relevant Product Data Gap.  We will extend the research to compare what the consumer sees in their application to the actual product on shelf (vs. the manufacturer’s impression of which product is current).  We will also test how consumer purchase behavior is affected by the disparity.   The report will cover:

  • The impact on shopper behavior
    • Sales
    • Dwell time
    • Brand – Banner perception
  • The significance of the problem in terms both of:
    • The percentage of products affected by the gap
    • The severity of the differences.

 

smallconsumerrelevantproductdata.jpg

So far our findings indicate that the  gap between the images that manufacturers think are current and the packaging the consumer actually sees on the shelf is well over 50%, regardless of the source of the images used in the consumer applications.   Mobile, online and even product specific paper coupon efforts are handicapped by this impediment.   Of that there can be no doubt.  This is an important set of findings and one of which marketing buyers need be aware.

The Role of Relevant CPG Product Images in Online – Mobile and At-The-Shelf Applications

Sunday, June 19th, 2011

ShelfSnap has documented a great deal of learning in CPG merchandising over the last two years.

A new area of study has begun to uncover and document a stubborn and significant gap between the product images featured on mobile – online applications and the actual product packaging at the shelf.   We are pleased to have the first publication of this occur in an important new online community of CG and Retail professionals called BrickMeetsClick.com. 

The focus of this new community is the intersection of where online and in-store shopping converge.  The founder and “architect” is Bill Bishop.   He engages what he terms black-belt thinkers from a variety of disciplines to help foster the discussion.  We were pleased to be his first black belt effort.    Read the piece here http://www.brickmeetsclick.com/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/5d7c27b7e82fad98115e93aaeaf5363a/files/do_the_images_match_6_14.pdf

and make BrickMeetsClick at least a weekly visit.

We will be examining more on this subject shortly in this blog as well.

brickmeetsclickproductimages2.jpg

Part Two of the F.I.X. Approach to Salvaging Category and Space Managment

Monday, May 30th, 2011

fix-comparison.jpg

Instant Planogram Access, Part of the F.I.X. approach to salvaging Category-Space Management. 

In our last blog we outlined a process, based on documenting the causes for the gaps between the plan for the shelf, and the actual shelf, for salvaging the current approach to category-space management.   We also covered the first element in the salvage process.   We said:

Our recommendations for salvaging the current category management/ shelf management model contains three process improvements. 

We call the approach the F.I.X. process:
F.I.X. stands for
• Fresh Start to the store POG
• Instant access for all parties who need to comply
• X-refer (cross refer any changes that are planned for the pog with the shelf status.)

Today let’s deal with the second element of the F.I.X. process, providing instant access to the planograms for all parties who need to comply.   In the newly released study, Optimizing the Value of Integrated DSD, from the GMA DSD committee one of the surprising findings was how difficult it was for trading partners to gain access to what was believed to be the current and store planograms.   The report indicates that access was unavailable for the store resources charged with maintaining those planograms at the shelf over 40% of the time! 

Having easy to use, perhaps even picture based, POGs available to anyone working a store shelf section is a critical step in creating an expectation that the shelf will be maintained as the trading partners have agreed.  If they cannot see and understand what the plan is, they cannot execute the shelf.  Seems obvious but in conducting the GMA study,  we ran into a number of cases where even headquarters staff had trouble laying their hands on what they believed to be the current, agreed upon planograms for a particular store.  In one case we were told by a retailer that they “thought they had some PDF files showing the plan but they were about 5 years old.”

This issue is clearly costly to both trading partners.  At the very least they cost:
• Sales for the items which are not treated as they should have been in the plan
• Sales for the items introduced but not in the plan (therefore there is not plan for them)
• Sales for a category sub-optimized on the fly by personnel who do not have the expertise or data on hand to effectively deal with introducing products, deleting products or changing facings or shelf positions, based on whatever criteria they use in the absence of an available plan
• The labor costs involved in constantly adjusting space and assortment, from the conditions encountered upon arrival at store.  In many cases these adjustments are redone by the next person addressing the shelf.  
• Ongoing credibility gap between the field and HQ on the plan vs. execution issues.
• Ongoing inability to be able to effectively measure the impact that plans are having on sales.

Recommendations:

The retailer needs to keep up-to-date planograms available right in each section.  That way stockers, brokers and others can readily refer to the set as it is meant to be.

Reading the pogs if they ARE available.
Not only do the planograms need to be easily available, they need to be readable.  I was in my local superstore the other day, which is being transformed into an even bigger superstore.  There were extra personnel wondering around trying to finish some of the aisle to aisle and within aisle changeouts.  It was pretty obvious that the plain text POGs were pretty cryptic for even experienced folks to interpret, and harder still for the unskilled.  Up to date product pictures would have helped this. 

None of this is easy, but perhaps most difficult of all is trying to match a fully filled section with a planograms and determine what is set according to the plan, what things are missing and what things are on the shelf but not in the plan.  The human eye-brain combination is not really built to generate this comparison, at least according to the Harvard Visual Attention Lab.  However, between this process and the use of ShelfSnap understanding compliance, and fixing it are well within reach for the first time. 

We will describe the third leg of this stool in an upcoming blog.  It will describe cross-referring agreed upon changes and keeping the planograms up to date so that all parties can agree on when something is not in compliance. 

ShelfSnap – Filling a Void in Shelf-Level Collaboration

Monday, January 4th, 2010

I have spent a good bit of space over the last two years writing about what I believe to be a fact, and that is that there are no silver bullet applications available to solve the front-to-back inefficiencies in the CPG and Retail compliance arena.   It doesn’t matter if we are talking about best of class “point” solutions or about the end to end solution suites.  They all promise to conquer compliance issues through some sort of exotic modeling based on POS movement combined with deliveries, or labor based self management task systems.

 

We have proven over this last year that the most amazing point and end-to-end solutions do generate great results in many areas in the supply chain.  They do not however result in better in-store compliance and we have proven that by looking at the significant deviations from plan in new product introductions, displays and POG resets across the largest retailers in the land.  Check any of our prior newsletters at where we document many of these studies. http://www.shelfsnap.com/news-events.php. 

 

ShelfSnap was developed to fill the last remaining gap in the in-store intelligence continuum. We are NOT a silver bullet.  We are a link…a link that was largely missing prior to now. Others have begun to see us in the same light. 

 

ARCweb’s Logistics Viewpoints is a thought provoking authority on all things supply chain.  Their premier analyst, Steve Banker, recently reached out to ShelfSnap and very quickly understood our key role in the demand chain.  Inference based estimates about store conditions have been in place for years and have changed nothing of consequence in the condition of products on-shelf, or on display. 

 

According to Steve,

 

“I see the ShelfSnap solution as providing a practical way for manufacturers and retailers to use planogram data for shelf-level collaboration, or for retailers themselves to have more effective task management at the store. I also see it as improving the alerts generated by existing DSR solutions.” 

 

ShelfSnap couldn’t agree more.    Please read the entire article at: 

http://logisticsviewpoints.com/2009/12/17/filling-a-void-in-shelf-level-collaboration/. Or give us a once over at ShelfSnap.com.  

RFID Update

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

Supermarket News reported in an early August post that CPG companies “are still making minimum  investments  in RFID technology to satisfy their retail business partners demands” and are “becoming increasingly skeptical about the benefits this technology offers.” (more…)

Measurement, Part of the Execution Solution!

Monday, August 4th, 2008

Plan, Do, Measure….That is the mantra of the In Store Implementation Share-group, and has been in one, shape or form the tactical basis of every effective management technique for many years.  (more…)

Health & Wellness 3.0?

Sunday, August 3rd, 2008

I have written extensively about the underlying product information challenges facing the companies attempting to inform consumers about eating more healthy through simplified labeling.   (more…)